Put together a draft of the falsifiability of different genetic civgene theories. Take a look. It should prove useful.
I’ve been asking myself this question since about since the civgene first dawned on me in about 2011 or so. Most ‘leaders’ are simply in the right place at the right time. The person will need certain skills, but they always need to be ‘lucky’ in the timing of their role. I am no exception. The closer I look the more I realize that everything was set up just right, and I very nearly just had to be present. The moment of inception the tiniest breeze. Had things been even slightly less well timed I would have noticed, and contributed, nothing. I am merely the envoy between civilization, and it’s readiness for a new idea.
I have an associates degree in computer science. My mother had a masters degree. My wife has two! I know I am capable of furthering my education, but never elected to. With some irony, this may have been the key to having all the pieces I needed to discover something new in science. A good monthly salary was my goal, when I recognized the need for intelligence and natural skill in system administration. I was about to begin my bachelors degree, when the dot com bubble swept me into a professional role.
Making myself into a Linux specialist, suited the needs in three separate scientific research institutions. This along with my non-profit Linux work gave me a broad base in both diverse computing environments and the social wonders of open source. My wife studied psychology. My mother studied and eventually taught business and economics after obtaining her MBA. I was exposed to disciplines that would rarely or never be placed together in a college environment. I am ‘passionately curious’ but in the past this manifested as an interest in viewing, reading and writing science fiction, not pushing the boundaries of hard science
Ultimately it was some rough events in my personal life that drove me to look deeper into psychopaths. I wanted to find an angle to protect myself and others. Hare estimates that 1-5% of population are psychopaths. This is not small and made this the most likely part of my unlikely journey. It was inevitable that I would have a hard run in with a psychopath. That is everyone’s reality.
I’ve long since struggled with the huge leaps that economics takes to explain civilization, or money. For years I was at a loss to explain why anyone would anyone would help Linux for free. I’ve struggled to understand why artificial intelligence was so icy cold. How people can trust each other in the face of thousands or even tens of thousands of risks a day, seemingly unaware, and survive. In my desperation it all gelled together.
The civilization gene is obvious in hindsight. Once I knew roughly how psychopaths acted what was missing jumped out. My logical training made me look in both directions, spotting the absence of behavior, the negative instead of the positive. As if debugging a program. I had a rough idea that game theory failed in the real world from my own disappointment with AI, and from science studies. It connected to my cynicism about the foolish trust people but not animals seemed to display. Without every piece of my background I could not have connected the clues. The lynchpin was real world tuning of computers. Unassuming, unforgiving computers.
I would watch PBS as a child. For decades shows like ‘Nature’ were the best entertainment on the television. Years of programming just discussing, filming and studying animal behaviour. Monkeys, primates, any of them. They move around. No animal with legs or wings longer than a centimeter stays put. They can have territories, but not properties. Only mankind, and only at the beginning of civilization, had such a distinction. That’s a big change. It doesn’t just happen for no reason.
Psychopaths are cavemen. Currency and investment, the cornerstones of civilization, are just huge bags of trust. Something you can’t have without empathy. The realization flashed into existence. The solution to the chicken and the egg problem of economics. Who trusted first and why. It wasn’t a choice. Empathy, at least at the scale only humans display, is a mutation. The very last one most of us shared. Everything after, as they say, is history.
This is an easier question. The easy answer is one acronym. MRI. And all the technologies that led up to it. Dr. Robert Hare demonstrated a clear pattern of different brain activity between a psychopath and empath. That would not have been possible without the MRI.
The same scans that helped me to recognize, combined with civgene, how the conscience actually works. Body part and body function archetype thoughts light up the brain. I recognized the signature for the empath from computing. A computer database thrashing a computers hard drive on a wildcard search. The physical structure wasn’t important, but what it was doing. Accessing every memory at once. All connected. A passively driven database connected by emotion. A metamind.
I’d also say the Internet. It is both responsible for a growing breadth of knowlage, dissemination of it, and for open source and Linux themselves. I can’t deny the impact of watching a hobby grow into the most important operating system in the world without a single line of code written under threat of hard power. Massive cooperation, investment, and economy of scale without any psychopathic behaviour driving it. Open source is what science aspires to be. Pragmatic but testable and repeatable. Open both to innovation and scrutiny by anyone. Perhaps someone else could have put it together without the society behind open source, but I could not.
I wanted to write this so that people can understand how it is possible that I without a grant, a PHD, or even more than a passing interest until a few years ago could be the one to discover something so fundamentally important to humanity, it’s origin. Why not someone who is smarter, or more schooled? This is the right time. Had I not found it someone else would have. The MRI and the Internet and open source were all in place by about the mid 1990s. A whole sixteen years passed before I finally pieced it together. The background was there, but I was missing something. The study of psychopathy. A few well written books and civgene snapped into place.
Thanks to Dr Whitney Winter for suggesting I write this.
We are all psychopaths underneath our conscience. Since even low EQ/IQ empaths ace the psychopath variations of wants/abilities/limits with the aid of the metamind, and one third of that is (psychopath ‘abilities’ aka ASPD) we will always be capible of violence.
All animals are violent. It’s not personal. It’s survival. Compared to us they are all psychopaths. We project our love, compassion and empathy all around us. People, animals, plants, inanimate objects. Especially if it has a large head to body ratio and big eyes. A non psychopath human (an empath) can flatten any other selfless act in the animal kingdom to a rounding error in pure scale.
When our conscience/metamind determines that someone/something else doesn’t have a conscience, it sets our inner psychopath loose. Violence becomes many times more likely.
Note that a metapsychopath may have no negative reaction to a moment of external ‘no conscience’ realization. It’s because they have been conditioning their psychopathic self to act on behalf of the conscience, but without it’s typical continuous input. No loss of control occurs as the state of logical selfishness is reached, because it has been reconciled with and serves the temporally dormant metamind. The conscience simply steps back the and empath deals with the situation in strictly rational terms.
The metamind can even be the driving force behind violence. For instance violence in the name of a faith. A conscience can normalize the idea that a particular faith is the only valid demonstration of a person having a conscience. Then it lets the inner psychopath loose and screams, strikes, rapes and kills like a Viking raiding party.
That example is why it’s so important to separate faith from cult. Cult thinks it is the only true path, demonstrated by thinking it is above reproach. If you deviate from it, criticize it, or try to leave it, the conscience of it’s members shut off, and it’s members become temporary psychopaths in the face of a heretic. Sooner or later, violence results.
Why does this not occur with the metapsychopath? Because they are in control of the change. Their rational and metamind are resolved. Usually way in advance through inner work as rationalization and emotional self learning.
The cult is not just a faith but an organization. And organization that programs it’s members into protopsychopaths. The protopsychopath has no control over the change. They see, react, and act.
Faith is critical to the conscience, but it can never be allowed to monopolize it. The worst ASPD psychopath can’t hold a candle to the destructive power of a faithful fanatic with a conscience. For individual action, ruthless self sacrifice is unmatched in our world. The check to prevent faith from leading to protopsychopathy is the recognition that we can only grow emotionally through doubt and mistakes. That knowlage is critical to being in control of ones own conscience.
That’s the difference between a religion and a cult. Both are organizations of faith, but only one disables the individuals ability to control their own conscience.